
We’ve spent over 10,000 miles testing more than 30 pairs of hiking shorts – analyzing their durability, functionality, and comfort, and all-around performance on trails across the country.
Editor’s Note: We updated this guide on June 11, 2026, to add four new favorite shorts to our list, update the Oiselle Roga to reflect its latest design, and refresh our coverage on several old favorites.
How We Test Women’s Hiking Shorts
We’ve researched and then trail-tested pairs from trusted outdoor brands like REI, Patagonia, Outdoor Research, prAna, and athletic brands that work just as well in the gym as they do with a loaded pack crossing a scree field. We put every pair through its paces on varied terrain – from dusty desert routes to muddy high-alpine trails. They have seen sun, rain, and everything in between.
And for more info, check out some of our other popular gear guides:
#1. Best Women’s Hiking Shorts Overall

The REI Trailmade are lightweight, comfortable, and quick-drying, making them a versatile option on the trail or by the water. After 500 miles of hiking and backpacking, they are our favorite pair for pretty much any warm-weather outdoor adventure.
Quick Picks for Women’s Hiking Shorts
Check out this quick list of our favorites if you’re in a hurry, or continue scrolling to see our full list of the best hiking shorts with in-depth reviews.
1. Best Women’s Hiking Shorts Overall: REI Trailmade ($50)
2. Best Ultralight Hiking Shorts: Patagonia Multi Trails ($75)
3. Best Quick-Drying Hiking Shorts: Patagonia Baggies ($75)
4. Best Trail Running Shorts: Oiselle Roga ($79)
5. Best Trail-to-Town Hiking Shorts: Stio Vallis ($89)
6. Best Hiking Shorts for Pocket-lovers: Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5” ($75)
7. Best Value Hiking Shorts: REI Sahara Bermuda ($60)
8. Most Durable Hiking Shorts: Outdoor Research Ferrosi ($90)
9. Best High-Waisted Classic Hiking Shorts: prAna Stretch Zion Cargo Shorts ($84)
10. Comfortable Knee-Length Hiking Shorts: Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda Shorts ($79)
11. Best Warm-Weather Hiking Shorts: Black Diamond Pursuit ($99)
12. Best Compression Shorts for Hiking: Fjallraven Abisko 6” Shorts Tights ($90)
13. Versatile & Durable Hiking Shorts: Patagonia Quandary ($79)
Women’s REI Trailmade Shorts
Best Women’s Hiking Shorts Overall & Fastest Drying
CleverHiker Rating: 4.8/5.0
Price: $50
Weight: 5.7 oz.
Inseam: 5 in
UPF Rating: 50+
Fabric: 96% nylon, 6% spandex
Pockets: 6
Pros
- Stretchy, soft & lightweight
- Super quick to dry
- Effective DWR finish
- 6 pockets
- UPF 50+
- Works for hiking and boating
- Nice colorways
Cons
- Phone doesn't feel good in the pocket
- Front cinch on waistband sticks out and can't be tucked in
- Only one length option
The REI Trailmade short are undoubtedly our favorite, earning them our highest ranking for women this year. They thoroughly impressed us in all categories, the price is super friendly, and we honestly had to nitpick to find any negatives about this style. We just loved the soft, stretchy material, which is deceptive because it is incredibly durable and abrasion-resistant.
Additionally, the DWR coating provides impressive water resistance. Even when submerged in a lake on our hike, the shorts were still almost repelling moisture when underwater. As soon as we emerged from the lake, water beaded off the shorts, and the fabric didn’t cling to our skin or feel weighed down. After hitting the trail for another 15 to 20 minutes, the Trailmade Shorts were completely dry.
REI designed an outstanding product with the Trailmade Shorts. We love the versatile 5-inch length, UPF 50+ rating, six-pocket layout, and earthy colors. Our only small gripe is that the hand pockets extend the full length of the shorts. As a result, they are not ideal for stashing larger items like a phone while you’re on the move. The material sags when weighed down and causes objects to bounce against your thigh (creating a risk of chafing over several miles).
Lastly, we aren’t huge fans of the front cinch on the shorts – it sticks out at the front of the waistband and cannot be tucked away or laid flat. Even so, we enjoyed the shorts’ flattering fit.
Out of all the hiking shorts in our lineup, the REI Trailmade stands out as the most well-rounded. They ranked highly in most of our metrics while coming in at a very affordable price point.
Women’s Patagonia Multi Trails
Best Ultralight Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.7/5.0
Price: $75
Weight: 4 oz.
Inseam: 5.5 in
UPF Rating: –
Fabric: 90% recycled polyester / 10% spandex
Pros
- Stretchy
- Dries quickly
- Breathable
- Ultralight
- Two zippered pockets
- Extremely soft
- DWR coating
Cons
- Not as durable
- Built-in liner runs small
The Patagonia Multi Trails are one of our favorite hiking shorts for many reasons. Although they have a higher-than-average price point, we feel they are worth the money for their well-executed storage layout, lightness, and comfort.
The Multi Trails win with their more flattering fit, the inclusion of zippered pockets and a key loop, and thinner seams on the liner. Though not billowy, the fabric is so light they are plenty breathable and airy for toasty days on trail.
When we put a lot of items in the pockets, the shorts will sag a bit. There is an internal drawcord to help, although it’s only mildly effective. The lightweight material of the Multi Trails is a little thin, and they are showing some signs of wear after a season of hiking, so we don’t wear them on trails with a lot of bushwhacking or rock scrambling.
In the end, we think the trade-offs are worth it for these shorts’ lightweight build, nice feature set, and great next-to-skin feel.
Women’s Patagonia Baggies
Best Quick-Drying Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.6/5.0
Price: $75
Weight: 5 oz.
Inseam: 2.5 or 5 in
UPF Rating: –
Fabric: 100% recycled nylon
Pockets: 2
Pros
- Durable
- Dry quickly
- Easy to get on & off
- Good value
- Pockets & key loop
- Comfortable
Cons
- Stiffer fabric
- Ribbed waist can rub
The Patagonia Baggies are an easy-wearing pair of hiking shorts that excel for short hikes and everyday wear. They are durable, comfortable, and versatile – we wear them for just about anything, whether outdoors or around the house.
Made from thick but surprisingly lightweight recycled nylon, they hold up well against wear and tear and dry very fast. They’re easy to slip on and off, have deep front pockets, and feature an elasticized waist with a drawcord for cinching things down. The waistband is ribbed and – although functional – can sometimes cause rubbing, especially on long hikes. The pull cord is a little chunky, too, but not a true concern.
These shorts feature mesh-lined pockets and a key loop for convenient storage, but we wish for zippered closures to keep items more secure. Despite the fabric’s stiffness, the shorts are comfortable and feel great during most hikes we did around Lake Tahoe during testing.
They’re also a solid value, offering long-term durability at a price that won’t break the bank (not to mention, Patagonia offers stellar repair services). If you want an easy-to-wear, sturdy pair of shorts that dry quickly, the Baggies are a top contender.
Oiselle Roga
Best Trail Running Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.5/5.0
Price: $79
Weight: 4.4 oz.
Inseam: 1.75, 4 or 6 in
UPF Rating: n/a
Fabric: 86% polyester, 14% spandex
Pockets: 1
Pros
- Light & airy
- Just-right coverage for running
- Soft & comfortable fabric
- Wide, unobtrusive waistband
- Many colors & patterns
Cons
- We miss the wraparound storage of previous iteration
- Price
- Quick to wet out & slow dry-time
- Some reviews reported chafing (we didn't however)
Oiselle is a running company, and the Roga shorts are marketed as running shorts. Yet, they’ve been a favorite hiking short of ours for years, providing great on-trail comfort no matter the pace or objective.
In testing the latest Roga Shorts, we were immediately struck by the shorts’ lightweight, airy feel. They went unnoticed on hikes and runs alike. The waistband is wide and low-profile, allowing it to pair seamlessly with a hipbelt. We also love that the Roga shorts are offered in several fun colors and designs, adding a nice dose of flair.
If you liked the Oiselle Toolbelt Roga, we’re sad to report that the Roga here is significantly different. The biggest omission is the lack of wraparound storage, which made it very easy to stash and access small essentials and snacks on the move. The latest Roga ditches the “toolbelt” designation and swaps in a single zippered pocket at the rear. Our smartphone barely fit without its case, and it was a tight enough squeeze that we were worried about breaking the zipper.
Another downside is that these shorts are fast to wet out and slow to dry. This likely won’t be a dealbreaker for most runners and hikers, but it’s nevertheless worth noting for those embarking on multi-day trips in inclement weather.
Apart from the storage downgrade and unimpressive water resistance/drying time, we found little to complain about with the Oiselle Roga. These shorts are light, airy, and offer great all-day comfort. From long trail runs to short afternoon hikes, the Roga was quick to earn a spot in our regular rotation.
More: Oiselle Roga Full Review
Women’s Stio Vallis
Best Trail-to-Town Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.5/5.0
Price: $89
Weight: 5.6 oz.
Inseam: 4 in
UPF Rating: n/a
Fabric: 100% polyester
Pockets: 3
Pros
- Flattering
- Soft & supple feel
- Easy to move in
- Impressive water resistance
- Quality construction
- Versatile for casual wear
- Nice colorways
Cons
- Not our favorite colorways
- One inseam length
- Just okay storage layout
If versatility and comfort are at the top of your priority list, look no further than the Stio Vallis. These shorts were quick to win us over in testing: they’re supremely soft and comfy, easy to move in, and look the part both outdoors and around town.
Despite being everyday-friendly, these shorts don’t skimp on performance with a stretchy polyester build that holds up well to regular use. They come well-appointed in the features department, too, with an external waist drawcord, drop-in hand pockets, a zippered back pocket, and a faux fly that lends a bit of style. There’s also a small cutout at the outside of either thigh – a subtle but attractive touch.
The DWR coating is extremely effective at repelling moisture. We had to hold the shorts underwater for several seconds before they started growing saturated. If we pulled them out too soon, water simply beaded up and rolled right off the fabric. They weren’t the fastest to dry, but they weren’t the slowest, either.
Some users complain that the fit runs big, but we found the Stio Vallis true to size. The 4-inch inseam nicely balances coverage and style, although we did experience some slight riding up.
Our biggest complaint was that the light Pebble colorway we tested is prone to staining. While that is both a wearer error, it’s also evidence of just how comfortable and versatile these shorts are. Finally, the beige shorts very easy to dress up for post-hike meals or casual date nights.
Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5″
Best Hiking Shorts for Pocket-Lovers
CleverHiker Rating: 4.5/5.0
Price: $75
Weight: 3.5 oz.
Inseam: 2.5 or 4 in
UPF Rating: n/a
Fabric: 91% recycled polyester, 9% spandex
Pockets: 5
Pros
- Excellent pocket organization
- Built-in liner
- Quick-drying
- Breathable
- Lightweight
- Perforations for more breathability
- Anti-odor treatment
Cons
- Runs slightly large
- Internal drawcord is a little clunky and can get lost in the waistband if not tied
- Minimal coverage (we tested the 2.5 inch inseam)
Lightweight, breathable, and quick-drying, the Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5” shorts have barely there feel and make you feel nimble on the trail. They are designed with side perforations to increase airflow on challenging trails or in hot/exposed environments. We love the flattering cut of these shorter athletic shorts, and the odor-resistant liner provides extra coverage and support.
Though these shorts are ultralight, they don’t slack on features. With five pockets, including four key-sized compartments and a back zippered pocket, you can stash snacks and smaller items like Chapstick on the go. The shorts also include an internal drawcord, though we don’t particularly enjoy how stiff and bulky it is. The ends also have to be knotted before wearing and washing, otherwise the drawstring can retract into the waistband.
Due to their ultralight material, these shorts aren’t the most durable. But they do dry quickly, even though they lack water-resistant properties. We found that Rabbit products run larger than other brands – an important note, especially if you are purchasing online.
Women’s REI Sahara Bermuda
Best Value Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.4/5.0
Price: $60
Weight: 5.8 oz.
Inseam: 9 in.
UPF Rating: 50+
Fabric: 96% recycled nylon, 4% spandex
Pockets: 4
Pros
- Great performance for price
- Practical pocket layout
- Super quick-drying
- Effective DWR coating
- Generous coverage & UPF rating
- Sizing
Cons
- Runs warm
- Comfort is okay
- Dull colorways
REI is known for offering solid gear at hard-to-beat prices, and the Sahara Bermuda Shorts carry the torch. The second-cheapest option in our lineup (behind REI’s own Trailmade Shorts above), the Sahara Bermuda shorts are well-built and sturdy, and come nicely equipped to help you stay organized on the trail.
Though not the most comfortable, these shorts’ nylon/spandex construction is holding up impressively well. They show no signs of wear after a full season of hiking. We also appreciate their UPF 50+ protection on exposed hikes, which pairs nicely with the generous coverage.
That said, we have mixed feelings about the Sahara Bermuda’s length. On one hand, the shorts have great coverage for long days in the sun, bushwhacking, or scooting down rocks. On the other hand, they are not the most modern or stylish, especially if you’re used to shorter trail running shorts or leggings..
Our biggest complaint, however, is that the shorts run warm. The fabric isn’t particularly thick, but the extra coverage impedes airflow. We find ourselves growing sweaty quickly on mellow hikes in the low 70s, especially on trails with minimal shade. On the plus side, the shorts do dry very quickly.
The Sahara Shorts are sold in a healthy range of sizes, including women’s plus sizes up to 26W. The shorts fit us perfectly in our usual size, with no areas of bagginess or restriction. Mobility was excellent, too, which we didn’t expect given the longer length.
Minor gripes aside, there’s no denying that the Sahara Bermuda Shorts are a strong value. They cost significantly less than most shorts here while offering solid all-around performance – an enticing recipe for many hikers.
Women’s Outdoor Research Ferrosi
Most Durable Women’s Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.4/5.0
Price: $90
Weight: 7.4 oz.
Inseam: 5 or 6 in
UPF Rating: 50+
Fabric: 46% recycled nylon, 40% nylon, 14% spandex
Pros
- Stretchy
- UPF 50+
- Durable
- Quick drying with DWR coating
- Deep hand pockets with one zippered back pocket
Cons
- Price
- Belt is a little bulky/not useful
- Slightly awkward fit
- Not the softest material
After testing the latest Outdoor Research Ferrosi Shorts, our gear analyst came away disappointed with their fit and comfort. Though these shorts hold true to their long-lasting durability and quick-drying, water-resistant construction, they are far from the supplest or most flattering option.
The shorts fit our tester awkwardly: tight in the waist but loose everywhere else. This creates a “balloon effect” where the shorts billow out in the crotch area slightly. The integrated waist belt is also bulky and awkward (it was updated to be slightly wider than previous versions). We find that there isn’t enough space to cinch down the belt in the front, rendering it mostly useless.
Though we appreciate the stretch in the material for freedom of movement, the fabric isn’t as soft as other shorts in our lineup. However, we do love that the fabric has a UPF 50+ rating and that all four of the pockets are deep, including the single zippered pocket at the back.
Overall, the Outdoor Research Ferrosi Shorts would not be our first recommendation for comfort- or style-focused hikers. However, if long-term durability matters most to you, then these shorts are certainly worth checking out.
prAna Zion Cargo Shorts
Best Classic High-Waisted Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.4/5.0
Price: $84
Weight: 7.3 oz.
Inseam: 3 or 5 in
UPF Rating: 50+
Fabric: Nylon, elastane
Pockets: 5
Pros
- Waist cinch works well
- Angled zippered side pocket is super functional
- 2-way stretch material
- UPF 50+ fabric
Cons
- Ultra high-waisted, stiff crotch
- Not as breathable as some
- Long dry time
- Not at all water-resistant, clingy when wet
- Back pockets aren't easy to use
The prAna Stretch Zion Cargo shorts are among the more durable options in our lineup and feature the highest-rise. They feature a sturdy, tough construction that’s still stretchy for range of motion (although we find the crotch slightly bulky and stiff).
The material is unfortunately not water-resistant, clings uncomfortably to skin when wet, and takes a very long time to dry. We experienced this firsthand after submerging the shorts while lounging in a creek. We quickly regretted it after realizing that the hike out would not be very comfortable.
However, if they are dry, these shorts are a worthy contender for hikers who prefer high-waisted styles with excellent durability and features. In addition to a UPF 50+ rating, these shorts have five pockets. Our favorite of the bunch is the slanted zippered side pocket on the upper thigh, which comfortably fits a phone without causing chafing, sagging, or bouncing.
The waist also features webbing cinches on either side to customize the fit. We love this design and compared to other shorts we tested, it’s more effective and stylish.
Although they aren’t our favorite hiking shorts, the prAna Stretch Zion Cargo shorts are still a great option when we need a high-rise, abrasion-resistant, and pocket-packed design.
Women’s Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda
Comfortable Knee-Length Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.4/5.0
Price: $79
Weight: 5.4 oz.
Inseam: 9 in
UPF Rating: 50+
Fabric: 94% weave stretch woven nylon / 6% elastane
Pockets: 4
Pros
- Extremely soft
- Good storage
- Comfortable waistband
- Easy to get on/off
- No chaffing
- DWR coating
- Flattering length
Cons
- Less durable than others
- Can ride up in front
- Low rise leaves skin exposed
The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda stands out as a versatile and comfortable hiking short. They work for hiking, rock climbing, yoga, or even cycling. They may not be thick enough to withstand a truly aggressive or rocky adventure, but they work for most outdoor activities and offer pajama-like comfort.
Initially, the waistband was awkwardly tight, which helped keep the shorts up but led to a pinched look. The band did break in over time, but now we wish for a drawcord.
During testing, we immediately noticed how well they worked for high-stepping, scrambling, or navigating other tricky terrain, offering great flexibility without restriction. The elastic waistband eliminates the need for zippers or buttons – just slip them on and go. The deep pockets were also a pleasant surprise, easily swallowing keys and a phone, although they do pull down the shorts a bit when loaded up.
The fabric is extremely soft, though it tends to sag and degrade with washing and use. Plus, the low rise fit creates a lack of coverage that’s a tad uncomfortable for carrying packs. The undercarriage measurement from the back to the front of the shorts seemed unusually short, which can create some discomfort if the shorts rode up at the front.
The water-resistant fabric is a standout compared to other treated fabrics: Water simply beaded up and rolled off, and the shorts dried quickly when wet. Combined with their excellent comfort and unobtrusive waistband, the Dynama Bermuda is an easy-wearing multi-sport option.
Women’s Black Diamond Pursuit
Best Warm-Weather Hiking Shorts
CleverHiker Rating: 4.4/5.0
Price: $99
Weight: 5.9 oz.
Inseam: 6 in
UPF Rating: n/a
Fabric: 96% recycled nylon, 4% elastane
Pockets: 5
Pros
- Soft, stretchy fabric panels
- Deep hand pockets
- Balances coverage and style
- Convenient pocket layout
- Well constructed
Cons
- Waistband is snug and lacks stretch
- Prone to riding up
- Overly complex waist closure
- Price
New to our list of favorites, the Black Diamond Pursuit Shorts have a lot going for them. The best thing about them is their soft, stretchy fabric, which is a boon on a hot dusty trail. The waistband is noticeably snug and lacks give, which led to some discomfort and sizing regret, but the rest of the design is flexible and easy to move in.
We also enjoy the Pursuit’s storage layout, which comprises two deep hand pockets, two rear pockets (one zippered and one with a flap), and a small zippered security pocket at the right thigh. This final pocket is a great spot to stash lip balm, AirPods, or a gel, although it’s too small for a smartphone.
The 6-inch inseam nicely balances coverage and style, and the entire design is crafted from quality materials built to last. The mostly nylon construction is so far holding up flawlessly to bushwhacking, scrambling, and a handful of launderings. It also dries pretty quickly, although the waistband takes longer than the rest of the shorts.
In addition to the unforgiving waistband, the Pursuit Shorts tend to ride up. We noticed this almost immediately in testing, and it’s been a common theme on every outing. The waist closure is also a little complex for our liking, featuring two small snaps and a zippered fly – not our favorite combination for pairing with a hipbelt.
The Pursuit Shorts are the most expensive option on our list, but their high-quality build and thoughtful feature set help justify the price tag. They also do a nice job repelling moisture and dry relatively fast, which are nice characteristics for multi-day trips in particular.
Our complaints were enough to push the Pursuit toward the bottom of our list, but it’s nevertheless a high-quality option that doesn’t skimp on performance – or comfort, if you can nail the fit.
More: Black Diamond Pursuit Full Review
Women’s Fjallraven Abisko 6″ Biker Shorts
Best Compression Shorts for Hiking
CleverHiker Rating: 4.2/5.0
Price: $90
Weight: 5.1 oz.
Inseam: 6 in
UPF Rating: n/a
Fabric: 70% recycled polyester, 30% elastane
Pockets: 2
Pros
- Built to last
- Stretchy
- Practical sleeve pockets
- Waistband stays in place & pairs well with hipbelt
Cons
- Tight
- Not the most comfortable
- Prone to riding up
- Not water-repellent or quick-drying
With “tights” in the name, it’s no secret that the Fjallraven Abisko 6” Shorts Tights are snug. The compression-like fit was apparent the second we pulled them on (which took some effort).
If you can nail the fit, however, we think there’s plenty to like about these shorts. Starting with the fabric, the polyester/elastane blend is stretchy but very durable. We have a pair of Abisko leggings (which share a similar construction) that have lasted more than 6 years – including countless pitches of rock climbing on sharp limestone and rough granite.
The shorts also feature two deep, smartphone-friendly pockets, which is a relative rarity among compression shorts. Both pockets are secure with fabric flaps to keep items in place. It’s pretty effortful to get a phone in or out of either pocket as a result, but the fact that it stays securely in place (even when running) is nevertheless appreciated.
Unfortunately, we do have some comfort-related complaints. The shorts have a very tight fit (bordering on restrictive). For us, this is more of an issue at the legs than the waist. They start riding up immediately on each hike, and we all know how that feels and looks. There’s also a lot of stitching inside the shorts, resulting in less of a barely-there feel than many other designs on our list.
At the end of the day, we wish we had ordered a size up in the Abisko shorts – it likely would have led to a higher comfort rating. That said, if you can nail the fit, we think these shorts are a solid option for hikers wanting a close fit without sacrificing functional storage.
Women’s Patagonia Quandary
Durable Hiking Shorts with a Mid-Rise Fit
CleverHiker Rating: 4.2/5.0
Price: $79
Weight: 6 oz.
Inseam: 5 or 7 in
UPF Rating: n/a
Fabric: 96% NetPlus recycled nylon, 4% spandex
Pockets: 4
Pros
- Comfy
- Durable
- Stretchy
- Versatile
- Lightweight
- Four pockets
Cons
- Simple style
- No zippered storage
- Tends to ride up
The Patagonia Quandary Shorts are a versatile choice, offering a great mix of durability and classic styling. With their breathable, stretchy fabric, these shorts excel both in town and on the trail. They’re lightweight, and we often forget they are even there because of the smooth fabric and design. For this version of the Quandary, the fit is true to size (different from previous models, which ran large).
We like their classic design because it fits well into casual settings while still being functional for outdoor activities. There are plenty of pockets: two in the back and two in the front. No a zippered closure pockets, unfortuntately, but the hand pockets can easily hold a phone. There’s also a handy key loop on the front to secure your keys.
But they aren’t without drawbacks. The back pockets are somewhat impractical, and the internal drawcord, though useful, can be fiddly. We prefer shorts that just stay up on their own. The Quandary also lacks a belt but does have belt loops (which we are unlikely to use). Because of the fit, we find the length practical, but this style tends to ride up over time.
Despite these minor issues, the Quandary Shorts are a solid value. They strike a nice balance between style and performance, making them a versatile choice for those who need reliable shorts that can transition seamlessly from a city outing to an outdoor adventure.

Product Comparison Table
| oSort | Product | Price | Weight | Inseam | Fabric | Comfort | Durability | Features | Dry Time | Weight & Packability | CleverHiker Rating | 0 |
REI Trailmade Shorts View at REI |
$50 | 5.7 oz. | 5 in | 96% nylon, 6% spandex | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 4.7 | – | 1 |
Patagonia Multi Trails View at REI View at Patagonia |
$75 | 4 oz. | 5.5 in | 90% recycled polyester / 10% spandex | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 4.9 | – | 2 |
Patagonia Baggies View at REI View at Patagonia |
$75 | 5 oz. | 2.5 or 5 in | 100% recycled nylon | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.7 | – | 3 |
Oiselle Roga View at REI View at Oiselle |
$79 | 4.4 oz. | 1.75, 4 or 6 in | 86% polyester, 14% spandex | 4.9 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.9 | – | 4 |
Stio Vallis View at REI View at Stio |
$89 | 5.6 oz. | 4 in | 100% polyester | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | – | 5 |
Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5″ View at REI View at Rabbit |
$75 | 3.5 oz. | 2.5 or 4 in | 91% recycled polyester, 9% spandex | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 5.0 | – | 6 |
REI Sahara Bermuda View At REI |
$60 | 5.8 oz. | 9 in. | 96% recycled nylon, 4% spandex | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.4/5.0 | 7 |
Outdoor Research Ferrosi View at REI View at Amazon |
$90 | 7.4 oz. | 5 or 6 in | 46% recycled nylon, 40% nylon, 14% spandex | 4.0 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.3 | – | 8 |
prAna Zion Cargo Shorts View at REI View at prAna |
$84 | 7.3 oz. | 3 or 5 in | Nylon, elastane | 4.3 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 3.8 | 4.1 | – | 9 |
Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda View at REI View at Amazon |
$79 | 5.4 oz. | 9 in | 94% weave stretch woven nylon / 6% elastane | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.7 | – | 10 |
Black Diamond Pursuit View at Amazon View at Black Diamond |
$99 | 5.9 oz. | 6 in | 96% recycled nylon, 4% elastane | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | – | 11 |
Fjallraven Abisko 6″ Biker Shorts View at Amazon View at Fjallraven |
$90 | 5.1 oz. | 6 in | 70% recycled polyester, 30% elastane | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.2 | – | 12 |
Patagonia Quandary View at REI View at Patagonia |
$79 | 6 oz. | 5 or 7 in | 96% NetPlus recycled nylon, 4% spandex | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.0 | – |
|---|

Analysis & Results
When we evaluate hiking shorts, several key metrics come into play, including comfort, weight, durability, and features. Here’s how the top-performing models stack up against each other in our rigorous hands-on testing.
Which hiking shorts are the best value?
The top-rated REI Trailmade Shorts are the best bang-for-buck shorts. Their well-rounded performance earned them the top spot in our lineup. With six pockets, UPF 50+ sun protection, and even a cord loop at the waistband for hanging a pair of sunglasses, these shorts are hard to beat for features and function at a great price point.
For a little more dough than the Trailmade, the Sahara Bermuda offers 4 inches more coverage and a wider size range. They’re made with a similar material mix, although they’re a little less stretchy than the Trailmade. But overall, these shorts are an economical choice for budget-minded hikers who don’t want to skimp on performance.
Apart from the two REI shorts mentioned above, there’s a pretty narrow spread in cost. The Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5” isn’t priced as aggressively, but it’s a solid value, given that it can be worn for both running and hiking. The Oiselle Roga can, too, although its single-pocket layout is less ideal than the Rabbit’s for long days on the trail.
The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda and Patagonia Quandary both stand out as solid options for the price, with generous coverage, practical storage, and quality constructions from reputable brands. Though a bit pricier, the Stio Vallis Shorts are a decent buy since you can wear them both outdoors and around town – they fit in much better at the brewery than the Dynama or Sahara Bermuda shorts.
Which hiking shorts are the most comfortable?
The Patagonia Multi Trails and Oiselle Roga offer excellent comfort. Both are fantastic for hiking thanks to their airy and streamlined designs that go largely unnoticed throughout the day. They also feature soft, stretchy waistbands that pair well under hip belts. From hot-weather hiking to trail running, these shorts are supremely comfy.
The Mountain Hardwear Dynama Bermuda has the softest fabric of all the shorts we tested. The supple, flexible construction has an almost pajama-like feel, but the shorts have an unusually short undercarriage measurement, which is worth noting before buying.
The Stio Vallis is similarly smooth and pliable, with an all-polyester construction that offers an airy, barely there feel. The fabric features four-way stretch for unrestricted mobility. In testing, they felt more like running shorts than a hiking design. They were comfortable enough that we often left them on after testing for errands and other around-town activities.
A final strong contender in the comfort category is the REI Trailmade. Made with 94% nylon and 6% spandex, they strike a nice balance between softness and stretch. The fabric felt comfortable against the skin and never caused any chafing or discomfort, and the elasticized waistband sits flat without pinching or riding up.
Which hiking shorts are the most durable?
When it comes to durability, prAna Stretch Zion Cargo shorts are the winner, winner, chicken dinner. The Stretch Zion’s fabric is tough yet comfortable. Whether we’re scrambling over rocks or navigating thick vegetation, these shorts hold up exceptionally well.
By comparison, the Outdoor Research Ferrosi shorts offer a nice balance between durability and flexibility. Though not as thick as the prAna shorts, the Ferrosi uses a softshell fabric that resists tears and abrasions while maintaining a stretchiness that feels liberating during technical hikes. They’re ideal for those who don’t want to sacrifice freedom of movement while tackling more advanced trails and off-trail routes.
Another standout in our testing was the Fjallraven Abisko. We have a pair of Abisko pants that’s lasted us over six years and has seen countless rock-climbing pitches with very little to show for it. The shorts are similarly well built with a technical fabric that gives (rather than tears) under pressure.
Finally, the REI Sahara Bermuda Shorts strike us as perfectly durable for most hikers. Though not the thickest option on our list, they are reasonably sturdy and abrasion-resistant, showing no signs of wear after several pokey hikes and a couple of short bouldering sessions on rough granite.

Which hiking shorts have the best features?
At the top for functional features, the prAna Stretch Zion Cargo, Outdoor Research Ferrosi, REI Trailmade, and Patagonia Quandary each have memorable and practical features that are actually usable. They make accessing items while hiking far more convenient.
The prAna Stretch Zion Cargo Shorts feature a well-designed waistband with belt loops and practical pockets that offer ample storage. The rear pockets feature zippered closures, the open hand pockets are deep, and there’s an additional zippered security pocket on the left hip. The shorts also have a UPF 50+ rating for sun protection.
The Outdoor Research Ferrosi shorts stand out for their deep and well-designed front pockets. These pockets are strategically placed for easy access, and the strong waistband provides a secure and adjustable fit with the built-in belt. The waist is a bit tight for some, but we like the thickness of the elastic because it means the shorts won’t fall down, even with things in the pockets. The back pockets are also actually useful.
The REI Trailmade has the most generous storage layout on our list, with six pockets for divvying up on-trail essentials. There are two drop-in hand pockets, two rear drop-in pockets, and two flap-protected thigh pockets. The shorts also feature a small loop at the waistband for suspending sunglasses, as well as UPF 50+ sun protection and a waist bungee.
Finally, we want to call out the Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5” and Fjallraven Abisko 6” Shorts Tights. Both options are well-appointed, given their streamlined designs. The Fuel n’ Fly shorts offer more storage than most running shorts, including a back zippered pocket that fits most phones, two rear stash pockets, and two internal stash pockets at the front. The Abisko shorts feature a deep, phone-friendly pocket at either side, with fabric flaps to keep items secure and minimize bounce.
Which hiking shorts dry the fastest?
The REI Trailmade Shorts lead the pack with their ultralight fabric, designed specifically to dry fast. These shorts perform exceptionally well in hot conditions, drying almost instantly when exposed to the sun. The Trailmade’s DWR coating works wonders at repelling moisture, preventing the shorts from becoming saturated and weighed down by water. Even after being submerged in water, the shorts didn’t cling to our skin, and they were dry within 15 to 20 minutes of hitting the trail.
The Patagonia Multi Trails Shorts also dry extremely fast. Their ultra-soft, breathable fabric provides reliable moisture control during intense activity. The Multi Trails also bead off light rain and remain comfy when wet.
The Patagonia Baggies were impressive in this area, too. The fabric performs exceptionally well in hot and humid conditions, drying almost instantly when exposed to air. This makes them an ideal choice for scenarios where moisture management is critical, such as long hikes in wet or humid environments.
The Outdoor Research Ferrosi shorts feature a fabric blend that dries extremely quickly and is more durable than some other quick-drying shorts. We wore them in extremely sweaty conditions, and they remained comfortable while drying in what felt like no time at all. They are a solid choice for those who need reliable moisture management without sacrificing other features.
Which shorts are the lightest & most packable?
If you’re looking for ultralight options, the Rabbit Fuel n’ Fly 2.5” shorts are the lightest design on our list at a feathery 3.5 ounces. They’re great for fast hikes or trail runs where every ounce matters, allowing for effortless movement with minimal bulk.
The Patagonia Multi Trails come in at 4 ounces, making them another top contender in the ultralight category. Although slightly heavier than the Rabbit shorts, the Multi Trails strike a great balance between weight and features, including a more robust waistband and better coverage. They are an excellent choice for those who want to keep things light and free-flowing without eschewing all creature comforts.
Next up are the Oiselle Roga and Patagonia Baggies at 4.4 and 5 ounces, respectively. Like the Rabbit shorts, the Rogas are designed for running with limited coverage (although more than the Fuel n’ Fly) and a streamlined design that prioritizes freedom of movement. Part of the weight savings is due to the Roga’s minimalist feature set, which includes just one zippered pocket at the rear that’s not big enough for a smartphone.
On the other hand, the Baggies provide excellent durability and a versatile style that works beyond the trail. They’re more substantial than all of the options mentioned above. Although not ultralight, they strike a great balance between weight and functionality, especially if you’re looking for a pair of shorts that can transition from hiking to more relaxed environments.

How to Choose Hiking Shorts
How Long Should Hiking Shorts Be?
The shorts we tested have inseam lengths ranging from 2.5 to 9 inches, which is a fairly wide spread, and there’s a use-case for all of them. At the short end are athletic shorts (often best for day hikes and trail running), which offer minimal coverage and protection but excellent breathability and mobility.
If you do a lot of scrambling or high-stepping, a shorter option will allow for easier freedom of movement. However, you lose protection should you need to butt scoot over sharp rock or know some scree sliding is inevitable (in this case, pants might be best.
At the long end are Bermuda styles, which cover the entire thigh. Breathability often suffers from the extra coverage, but some hikers will find the trade-off worth it, especially those who spend a lot of time bushwhacking or sliding through slot canyons.
For general hiking, we tend to gravitate toward shorts in the middle of the pack, with a 4- to 6-inch inseam being the sweet spot for balancing coverage and mobility.

Are Athletic Shorts Good for Hiking?
Many athletic shorts make great hikers, but there are some caveats to note. First, hikers will appreciate secure storage – or at least deep hand pockets that can hold a smartphone and sunscreen sticks semi-securely.
Second, you’ll want to make sure there’s enough coverage for your liking. Many athletic designs have short inseams that offer limited protection against the sun, bugs, and scrapes from rocks, branches, and other abrasive surfaces.
If you like to split your time between running and hiking, athletic shorts make a lot of sense. Most are lightweight, highly breathable, easy to move in, and quick-drying. They are also typically very streamlined, meaning no excess material or hardware to get in your way.
Some hikers will want more coverage and protection, but we gravitate toward athletic shorts for everything from trail runs to multi-day backpacking trips.

What is the best fabric for hiking shorts?
Synthetic materials are great for outdoor clothing since they’re durable and don’t absorb moisture. We prefer shorts made with stretchy fabrics to allow for easy movement.
Nylon
Nylon is an exceptionally durable synthetic fabric that dries quickly. It tends to feel slightly softer on the skin than other synthetics. Because of the way nylon is made, it tends to be a bit pricier.
Polyester
Polyester is very durable (although slightly less so than nylon) and naturally hydrophobic. It absorbs less water than nylon and wicks moisture more effectively. It’s also less prone to pilling, so it will stay looking nice for longer.
Spandex/elastane
We prefer hiking shorts with some spandex/elastane for mobility. Most shorts we tested have two-way stretch, which means they stretch in one direction (typically crosswise). Some have four-way stretch, which means the fabric stretches crosswise and lengthwise. Four-way stretch is usually more expensive, but it’s also more comfortable and provides a better range of motion.
Cotton
Cotton is soft and comfortable, but it absorbs water. It dries very slowly, sticks to skin, causes chafing when wet, and can be potentially dangerous in cold/wet climates. Because of these downsides, cotton is generally not recommended for outdoor activities.

What pockets do I need on my hiking shorts?
Many hikers (ourselves included) never max out the storage on their hiking shorts. Items stored in them can feel bothersome and impede movement, so we typically prefer to stash items in a jacket, fanny pack, hydration vest, or pack instead.
That said, we often find ourselves using at least one pocket to temporarily stash a smartphone, swallow our keys, or keep lip balm handy. Zippered pockets on the thigh tend to be the most useful, in our experience. We’ll keep small items like Chapstick, AirPods, or a multitool in there for quick access.
Front pockets can be useful around town, but we rarely use them on the trail because they’re hard to access with a hipbelt on. Items stored in front pockets can also be uncomfortable when you have to lift your legs high for stepping over deadfall or scrambling.
We almost never use back pockets on the trail because they’re hard to access with a backpack on. Plus, things stored there get in the way when we want to sit down.

Why Trust CleverHiker
Gear Analysts Alice Hafer and Emily Parnay have been busy putting in the miles in these hiking shorts. With backgrounds in gear sales, product reviews, and combined decades of outdoor experience, Alice and Emily maintain rigorous standards for quality and performance. Alice does much of her testing around Lake Tahoe, on the Appalachian Trail, and in the French Alps. Emily has hiked in countless shorts throughout California.
Gear analyst Sarah Nelson has been putting outdoor gear through its paces for more than 10 years. Based in the Reno area, Sarah does a lot of hiking and running in town and around nearby Lake Tahoe – whether it’s to enjoy some time outside after work, approach a crag, or train for a trail race. She prefers moving quickly on the trail, so she opts for shorts over hiking pants in most scenarios.

Testing Methodology
We tested these hiking shorts on countless hikes across diverse terrains, including the coastlines and forests of Northern California, Nevada, parts of the Tahoe Rim Trail, and the Pacific Crest Trail, in both hot and cool weather. Each pair was evaluated for comfort, weight, durability, and quick-drying performance through rigorous hikes and practical use.
How do we assess comfort?
We tested comfort by wearing the shorts on varied trails over several miles. We paid close attention to how the shorts fit around the waist, crotch, and seat, as well as through the legs. We checked for any discomfort caused by the waistband, whether it was too tight or loose, and evaluated if it chafed when worn with a backpack.
We also assessed the feel of the fabric against our skin and examined how the pockets and seams held up during movement. Key aspects included ensuring there was enough room for dynamic movements, such as stepping over rocks, and verifying that the shorts stayed in place without riding up.

How do we test durability?
We assessed durability by putting the shorts through a series of rugged adventures. This included hiking over rocky terrain and sitting and sliding on various surfaces. We also washed the shorts multiple times to evaluate how well they held up to repeated cycles. The focus was on whether the fabric showed signs of wear, such as fraying or fading, and if any seams or features became compromised.
What features do we look for?
We tested the unique features of each pair of shorts by evaluating their pockets, fasteners, and any additional design elements. This included the number and size of pockets, their locations, and whether they were useful, mostly for decoration, or big enough to comfortably and securely hold a phone.
We also checked for features like drawstrings, integrated belts, and any unique materials or care instructions. We tested each feature for functionality, such as how well the pockets secured essentials and how convenient and comfortable the waistband and belts were.

How do we measure dry time?
To test drying time, we submerged the shorts in water and then monitored how quickly they dried in various conditions. We compared them side by side under sunlight and observed their drying rates. We also tested their quick-drying capabilities by wearing them fully soaked and noting how long they took to dry.
How do we measure weight & packability?
To evaluate weight and packed size, we weighed the shorts on a kitchen scale and tested how compactly they could be packed by compressing them and seeing how they fit into a backpack or stuff sack. We noted if the shorts could be stowed easily and how much space they occupied when packed. This metric helped us determine their practicality for multi-day hikes or travel when space is at a premium.

Conclusion
Our detailed evaluations of hiking shorts consider comfort, drying time, durability, and features to help you make an informed choice and get the right hiking shorts for you. Whether you’re a casual weekend hiker looking for a nice balance of style and trail-readiness or an ultralight backpacker who demands the utmost performance out of their gear, there’s an option for you on our list above. As always, we welcome your comments and testing recommendations. Happy trails!